Keygent LLC Ranked Among Top California Education Municipal Advisors in 2016

Keygent LLC Ranked Among Top California Education Municipal Advisors in 2016.jpg

Keygent LLC Ranked Among Top California Education Municipal Advisors in 2016 Keygent LLC (“Keygent”) completed 39 California K-14 municipal bond financings totaling $1,896.4 billion in 2016, according to Thomson Reuters. By par amount, Keygent is ranked #2, and by number of issues, Keygent is ranked #4. The bond issuers include school districts and community college districts throughout the State of California. The financings include general obligation bonds, certificates of participation, special tax bonds and tax and revenue anticipation notes sold via negotiated sale, competitive sale or private placement. These financings also spanned tax-exempt and taxable structures as well as new money and refunding purposes.

Keygent is proud to serve California public education as an independent financial advisor.

Disclosure

Keygent is a registered municipal adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board; however, such registrations do not imply a certain level of skill or training and no inference to the contrary should be made.

The criteria for the Thomson Reuters financial advisor ranking reflects par amount and number of issues completed for California K-14 districts in calendar year 2016, and is based on information contained in the Thomson Reuters U.S. municipal debt database, which is sourced through direct deal submissions from banking and legal contributors coupled with research performed by Thomson Reuters research analysts across a broad range of sources, including regulatory filings, issuer statements, media, and pricing wires. No payment was required for inclusion in the rankings.   The rankings noted above are not representative of any one client’s experience and are not necessarily indicative of Keygent’s future performance.  Keygent is not aware of any facts that would call into question the validity of the rankings or the appropriateness of advertising inclusion therein.